Welcome to Dr. Nelson's
COX-2 Inhibitors and Bone Healing Page
Posted February 15, 2003 Last revised July 19, 2005

This article is available for purchase online from the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery or you can read it at the MGH Medical Library, 925-7393. The Abstract quoted here is from the original article and is available online from the National Library of Medicine.


The Effect of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors on Spinal Fusion

John Long, DVM, Stephen Lewis, MD, Timothy Kuklo, MD,
Yong Zhu, MD and K. Daniel Riew, MD

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish
Hospital at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

From the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, October, 2002.

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive
payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Abstract
Background: Spine surgeons discourage the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs following spine arthrodesis because of their inhibitory effect on bone-healing. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of the new cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on bone-healing. We undertook this study to determine the effects of these more selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on spinal fusion in
a rabbit model.

Methods: Seventy-two New Zealand White rabbits underwent a posterolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis with use of autologous iliac crest bone. Sixty-six rabbits survived the surgical procedure and the perioperative period and had an uneventful postoperative course. These rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. One group received 10 mg/kg of celecoxib orally, the second group received 10 mg/kg of indomethacin orally, and the third group (the control group) received 1 cm 3 of saline solution orally. The rabbits received the treatment daily for eight weeks, after which they were killed and the lumbar spine was harvested. The specimens were palpated for motion, radiographed, and prepared for histological analysis. The quality of the fusion was graded at each level by assigning a histological score of 0 to 7.

Results: Gross inspection and palpation revealed that 64% (fourteen) of the twenty-two control spines and 45% (ten) of the
twenty-two spines in the rabbits treated with celecoxib were fused. With the numbers available, this difference was not significant (p = 0.224). Of the twenty-two spines in the indomethacin-treated rabbits, 18% (four) were fused, and this percentage was significantly different from the control value (p = 0.002). On radiographic assessment, the spine segment was deemed to be fused in 82% (eighteen) of the twenty-two controls, 86% (nineteen) of the twenty-two rabbits treated with celecoxib, and 41% (nine) of the twenty-two indomethacin-treated animals. Only the difference between the indomethacin-treated and control groups was significant (p = 0.004). The histological scores averaged 5.2, 4.8, and 3.5 for the control, celecoxib, and indomethacin groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the control and indomethacin groups (p = 0.002) but not between the celecoxib and control groups (p = 0.161).

Conclusions: These results suggest that celecoxib does not significantly inhibit the rate of spinal fusion in rabbits. They also
suggest that the inhibitory effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bone-healing are likely mediated by inhibition of
cyclooxygenase-1 and that celecoxib is the better choice if treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is deemed
necessary following spinal arthrodesis

Would you like to search the medical library of the National Library Medicine for scientific papers on this topic? Just click on

Remember the admonition from the Patient Education Links Page: the Internet has a lot of information, much of it incorrect. I have reviewed the sites that I have linked to, and have only linked to sites when I personally know the surgeon who posted it, or am a member of the organization that posted it. However, I may not agree with all that is on that site, and it may have changed since I reviewed it. If any of the information is not consistent with what I have told you, please download the material and bring it in.